2015 · Open World · Superhero · Stealth
How long isBatman™: Arkham Knight?
by Rocksteady Studios
22 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 8 hours and 42 hours
Batman™: Arkham Knight among the 398 action-adventures here
The whole tier list#81
of 398
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 53%
- got past 2 hours
- +11 on the kind's 42%
- 24%
- past 20 hours
- +10 on the kind's 14%
- 63%
- launched it
- +7 on the kind's 56%
- 611
- libraries own it
- 1 in 4 of the 2,453 read here
Next to it in the ranking
A full turnaround: 50% of its first month's reviews recommend it, and 96% of the last year's.
51% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
86% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
89% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
91% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
94% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
96% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
98% recommend it at 100 to 200 hours
98% recommend it at 200 to 500 hours
97% recommend it past 500 hours
Does Batman™: Arkham Knight hold up?
Grows on people
86% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at 2–5 hours played, and 97% past 500 hours played.
Earned when the share recommending a game rises 8 points or more from its first stage past the two-hour mark to its last, never falls 5 points on the way, and at least 80% of all its Steam reviewers recommend it. Every game that holds it.
Do the first two hours of Batman™: Arkham Knight tell you?
In the first two hours51%recommend it
After that92%recommend it
10 in 100 said no: 7 after the window had closed, 3 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 22 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 8 hours and 42 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 161,000 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 86% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 97% past 500 hours.
6% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 51% of those recommend it. After the window, 92% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 70% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 7 hours in.
When would you get there?
3weeks
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 22 hours on Saturday, December 5.
Half of its reviewers had played between 8 and 42 hours: Nov 21 to Dec 25 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in Batman™: Arkham Knight?
The filter
The Frequency of Fear
13 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold Trail of Fear and never earned it.
How this is counted
86% of the players who launched Batman™: Arkham Knight hold Journey into Knight, its first story achievement on Steam, and 32% hold Master of Fear, its last. The steepest drop comes between Trail of Fear (77%) and The Frequency of Fear (64%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Before you play Batman™: Arkham Knight
Where did you leave it?
Stopped part way? Your Steam profile brings back the story so far, read aloud, up to the last story achievement you hold. Nothing past it.
No Steam, or played it elsewhere?
Is Batman™: Arkham Knight worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Batman™: Arkham Knight
- Steam list price, US
- $19.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 22 h
- action-adventure rate
- $2.50/h
- 22 h at that rate
- $55
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Batman™: Arkham Knight worth it? Yes.
A steal
2.8× the hours of a typical action-adventure, for the same money
Loved
92% recommend it after the refund windowmost action-adventures: 89%
Usually played
63% of owners here have played itmost action-adventures: 54%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $19.99, the typical player's 22 hours come to 91¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 92% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 91¢ an hour, Batman™: Arkham Knight is cheaper per hour than 480 of 512 action-adventures here: the typical one of 512 action-adventures here charges $2.50, so the same $19.99 buys 2.8× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (action-adventures) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Is Batman™: Arkham Knight better now than at launch?
June 2015
50%
≈ 11,700 reviews
Now
96%
≈ 16,700 reviews
50% of the Steam reviews posted in its first 30 days recommend it; 96% of those posted in the last 12 months do.
Earned when the Steam reviews of a game's last 12 months recommend it 10 points or more above those of its first 30 days, at 80% or higher, and the rise is still there between players with the same hours. Every game that holds it.
How this is counted
Its Steam reviews began in June 2015. Of those posted in the first 30 days, 50% recommend it; of those posted in the last 12 months, 96% do.
One token is 2% of the reviews first posted in its first 30 days, and in the last 12 months. Each counts with the verdict it carries today, so a review its author has since changed shows the new one. The biggest comebacks and falls.
Where can I play Batman™: Arkham Knight today?
Almost anywhere
PC, Switch, PS4 and Xbox One.
- todayPS42018in Batman: Arkham Collection
- todayPC2018in Batman: Arkham Collection
- todayXbox One2018in Batman: Arkham Collection
- todaySwitch2023
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines Batman™: Arkham Knight came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like Batman™: Arkham Knight?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Batman™: Arkham Knight, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Batman™: Arkham Knight would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@nestortillo holds this page
- 1st
@nestortillo51 h - 2nd
@greenarrow51 h - 3rd
@teddy-bear-inc36 h - 4th
@z3rox34 h - 5th
@you26 h - 6th
@ravage25 h - 7th
@geronimo24 h - 8th
@mobpsycho23 h
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with Batman™: Arkham Knight?
1 in 10
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like Batman™: Arkham Knight
Marvel's Spider-Man 2
Much the same as Batman: Arkham Knight
Liked · 84%Games like Marvel's Spider-Man 2
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Batman: Arkham Knight, but with parkour, and even better loved
Loved · 96%Games like Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
PROTOTYPE 2
Batman: Arkham Knight, but a hack and slash game, and half the hours
Mixed · 77%Games like PROTOTYPE 2
Prototype
Batman: Arkham Knight, but a hack and slash game, and a third of the hours
Liked · 80%Games like Prototype
Sleeping Dogs: Definitive Edition
Batman: Arkham Knight, but with martial arts, and gorier
Loved · 94%Games like Sleeping Dogs: Definitive Edition
Infinite Crisis
Batman: Arkham Knight, but free to play, and a MOBA
Mixed · 77%Games like Infinite Crisis
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from Batman™: Arkham Knight: a kind of game it is that Batman™: Arkham Knight is not, a feature its tags carry that Batman™: Arkham Knight's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.