2011 · Destruction · Sci-fi · Third-Person Shooter
How long isRed Faction: Armageddon?
by Volition
7.5 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 3 hours and 14 hours
Red Faction: Armageddon among the 186 third-person shooters here
The whole tier list#167
of 186
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 19%
- got past 2 hours
- −29 on the kind's 48%
- 3%
- past 20 hours
- −13 on the kind's 16%
- 35%
- launched it
- −28 on the kind's 63%
- 235
- libraries own it
- 1 in 11 of the 2,483 read here
Next to it in the ranking
A slow burner: 65% recommend it at 2–5 hours, 90% at 20–50 hours.
48% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
65% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
75% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
84% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
90% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
Does Red Faction: Armageddon hold up?
Grows on people
Do the first two hours of Red Faction: Armageddon tell you?
In the first two hours48%recommend it
After that78%recommend it
27 in 100 said no: 18 after the window had closed, 9 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 7.5 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 3 hours and 14 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 5,040 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 65% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 90% at 20–50 hours.
19% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 48% of those recommend it. After the window, 78% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 65% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 4 hours in.
When would you get there?
8days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 7.5 hours on Sunday, November 22.
Half of its reviewers had played between 3 and 14 hours: Nov 17 to Nov 28 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in Red Faction: Armageddon?
The filter
Vanguard
13 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold We're Not Alone and never earned it.
How this is counted
75% of the players who launched Red Faction: Armageddon hold Unto The Breach, its first story achievement on Steam, and 23% hold Breathe Easy, its last. The steepest drop comes between We're Not Alone (58%) and Vanguard (45%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Is Red Faction: Armageddon worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Red Faction: Armageddon
- Steam list price, US
- $19.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 7.5 h
- third-person shooter rate
- $2.50/h
- 7.5 h at that rate
- $19
About the going rate
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Red Faction: Armageddon worth it? It depends.
Fair price
About what a typical third-person shooter charges: $2.67 an hour
Mixed
78% recommend it after the refund windowmost third-person shooters: 86%
Often left unplayed
35% of owners here have played itmost third-person shooters: 65%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $19.99, the typical player's 7.5 hours come to $2.67 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 78% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. An hour of Red Faction: Armageddon costs about what the typical one of 198 third-person shooters here charges $2.50.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (third-person shooters) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Where can I play Red Faction: Armageddon today?
In a collection
Red Faction Collection, out on PC in 2014.
- PS32011
- Xbox 3602011
- todayPC2014in the collection
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines Red Faction: Armageddon came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like Red Faction: Armageddon?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Red Faction: Armageddon, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Red Faction: Armageddon would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@drezel holds this page
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with Red Faction: Armageddon?
1 in 1,210
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like Red Faction: Armageddon
Dead Space 2
Red Faction: Armageddon, but a survival horror game, and story-rich
Loved · 94%Games like Dead Space 2
Aliens: Fireteam Elite
Red Faction: Armageddon, but co-op, and about survival
Liked · 80%Games like Aliens: Fireteam Elite
Aliens: Colonial Marines
Red Faction: Armageddon, but co-op
Divisive · 62%Games like Aliens: Colonial Marines
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine - Anniversary Edition
Red Faction: Armageddon, but a hack and slash game
Ghostbusters: The Video Game Remastered
Red Faction: Armageddon, but funny
EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair
Red Faction: Armageddon, but couch co-op, and three times the hours
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from Red Faction: Armageddon: a kind of game it is that Red Faction: Armageddon is not, a feature its tags carry that Red Faction: Armageddon's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.