2024 · Souls-like · Online Co-Op · Action RPG
How long isNo Rest for the Wicked?
by Moon Studios GmbH
17 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 5.5 hours and 41 hours
No Rest for the Wicked among the 66 soulslikes here
The whole tier list#19
of 66
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 60%
- got past 2 hours
- +4 on the kind's 55%
- 20%
- past 20 hours
- −7 on the kind's 27%
- 76%
- launched it
- +8 on the kind's 68%
- 126
- libraries own it
- 1 in 20 of the 2,472 read here
Next to it in the ranking
On the long side for a soulslike: 17 hours for the typical player, longer than 77 of 110 soulslikes here.
56% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
74% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
78% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
83% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
84% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
84% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
86% recommend it at 100 to 200 hours
83% recommend it at 200 to 500 hours
Does No Rest for the Wicked hold up?
Grows on people
Do the first two hours of No Rest for the Wicked tell you?
In the first two hours56%recommend it
After that82%recommend it
21 in 100 said no: 17 after the window had closed, 4 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 17 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 5.5 hours and 41 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 82,900 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 74% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 83% at 200–500 hours.
9% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 56% of those recommend it. After the window, 82% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 80% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 9.5 hours in.
When would you get there?
17days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 17 hours on Tuesday, December 1.
Half of its reviewers had played between 5.5 and 41 hours: Nov 20 to Dec 25 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is No Rest for the Wicked worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
No Rest for the Wicked
- Steam list price, US
- $39.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 17 h
- soulslike rate
- $2.00/h
- 17 h at that rate
- $34
About the going rate
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is No Rest for the Wicked worth it? Yes.
Fair price
About what a typical soulslike charges: $2.35 an hour
Liked
82% recommend it after the refund windowmost soulslikes: 85%
Gets played
76% of owners here have played itmost soulslikes: 62%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $39.99, the typical player's 17 hours come to $2.35 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 82% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. An hour of No Rest for the Wicked costs about what the typical one of 110 soulslikes here charges $2.00.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (soulslikes) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Where can I play No Rest for the Wicked today?
On PC
Its own release still plays there: no collection or remaster needed.
- todayPC2024
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines No Rest for the Wicked came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like No Rest for the Wicked?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like No Rest for the Wicked, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long No Rest for the Wicked would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@rafel holds this page
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with No Rest for the Wicked?
1 in 363
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like No Rest for the Wicked
Lords of the Fallen
No Rest for the Wicked, but story-rich, and with dragons
Mixed · 68%Games like Lords of the Fallen
The First Berserker: Khazan
No Rest for the Wicked, but third-person, and not open world
Liked · 85%Games like The First Berserker: Khazan
ELDEN RING
No Rest for the Wicked, but harder, and four times the hours
Loved · 93%Games like ELDEN RING
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from No Rest for the Wicked: a kind of game it is that No Rest for the Wicked is not, a feature its tags carry that No Rest for the Wicked's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.