2026 · Incremental · Idler · Mining
How long isKeep on Mining! - Worlds?
8 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 5.5 hours and 13 hours
Less loved than most: only 81% recommend it past the refund window, reviewed worse than 81 of 97 incremental games here.
67% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
85% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
82% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
Does Keep on Mining! - Worlds hold up?
Grows on people
67% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at 2–5 hours played, and 82% at 10–20 hours played.
Earned when the share recommending a game rises 8 points or more from its first stage past the two-hour mark to its last, never falls 5 points on the way, and at least 80% of all its Steam reviewers recommend it. Every game that holds it.
Do the first two hours of Keep on Mining! - Worlds tell you?
In the first two hours60%recommend it
After that81%recommend it
18 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 2 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 8 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 5.5 hours and 13 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 2,000 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 67% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 82% at 10–20 hours.
5% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 60% of those recommend it. After the window, 81% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 91% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 7.5 hours in.
When would you get there?
8days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 8 hours on Thursday, October 29.
Half of its reviewers had played between 5.5 and 13 hours: Oct 27 to Nov 3 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in Keep on Mining! - Worlds?
The filter
Dragons Lair
6 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold Outer Space and never earned it.
How this is counted
98% of the players who launched Keep on Mining! - Worlds hold The Sahara, its first story achievement on Steam, and 54% hold Beat the game!, its last. The steepest drop comes between Outer Space (60%) and Dragons Lair (54%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Is Keep on Mining! - Worlds worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Keep on Mining! - Worlds
- Steam list price, US
- $6.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 8 h
- incremental game rate
- $1.00/h
- 8 h at that rate
- $8
About the going rate
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Keep on Mining! - Worlds worth it? Yes.
Fair price
About what a typical incremental game charges: 87¢ an hour
Liked
81% recommend it after the refund windowmost incremental games: 92%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $6.99, the typical player's 8 hours come to 87¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 81% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. An hour of Keep on Mining! - Worlds costs about what the typical one of 97 incremental games here charges $1.00.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (incremental games) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Would you like Keep on Mining! - Worlds?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Keep on Mining! - Worlds, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Keep on Mining! - Worlds would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
Games like Keep on Mining! - Worlds
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from Keep on Mining! - Worlds: a kind of game it is that Keep on Mining! - Worlds is not, a feature its tags carry that Keep on Mining! - Worlds's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.