Video Game Backlog

2020 · Puzzle · Turn-Based Tactics · Tactical RPG

How long isIron Danger?

by Action Squad Studios

7.5 hours

for the typical playerhalf of them between 2 hours and 15 hours

Iron Danger cover

Iron Danger among the 126 real-time tactics games here

The whole tier list
DPlayed tier

#122

of 126

ranked by owners here who played past two hours

3%
got past 2 hours
−31 on the kind's 33%
0%
past 20 hours
−8 on the kind's 8%
8%
launched it
−40 on the kind's 48%
118
libraries own it
1 in 21 of the 2,477 read here
Iron Danger ↓
#1 Manor Lords#126
92% of its owners here never launched it. More or fewer than the next game?Play higher or lower

Do the first two hours of Iron Danger tell you?

In the first two hours47%recommend it

After that80%recommend it

28 in 100 said no: 15 after the window had closed, 13 while a refund was still possible.

How this is counted

Half of its Steam reviewers had played 7.5 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 2 hours and 15 hours.

One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 1,030 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.

25% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 47% of those recommend it. After the window, 80% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 53% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 2.5 hours in.

Diese Seite auf Deutsch

When would you get there?

8days

At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 7.5 hours on Sunday, November 22.

Half of its reviewers had played between 2 and 15 hours: Nov 16 to Nov 29 at this pace.

How this is counted

The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.

Where do players get filtered in Iron Danger?

The filter

Found the Healer

36 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.

They hold First Shard and never earned it.

  1. Launched it100% launched it
  2. First Shard−1684% hold it
  3. Found the HealerYou found the fabled Healer of Brumehead.Filtered −3648% hold it
  4. Second Shard−3117% hold it
  5. Third Shard−512% hold it
  6. Fourth Shard−29.8% hold it
  7. Big FishKill the alpha Roosterfish in the temple under Rimfeden.9.6% hold it
  8. Fifth Shard−27.7% hold it
  9. Finished Iron DangerYou successfully completed Iron Danger. Congratulations!−17.4% hold it
How this is counted

84% of the players who launched Iron Danger hold First Shard, its first story achievement on Steam, and 7.4% hold Finished Iron Danger, its last. The steepest drop comes between First Shard (84%) and Found the Healer (48%).

Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.

Is Iron Danger worth it?

Is Iron Danger worth it? Probably not.

  • Pricey per hour

    A typical real-time tactics game gives 1.6× the hours for the money

  • Liked

    80% recommend it after the refund windowmost real-time tactics games: 86%

  • Often left unplayed

    8% of owners here have played itmost real-time tactics games: 48%

How this is counted

At Steam's US list price of $19.99, the typical player's 7.5 hours come to $2.67 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 80% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At $2.67 an hour, Iron Danger costs more per hour than 111 of 154 real-time tactics games here: the typical one of 154 real-time tactics games here charges $1.69.

The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (real-time tactics games) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.

Where can I play Iron Danger today?

On Xbox Series, PS5 and PC

Its own release still plays there: no collection or remaster needed.

  1. todayPC2020
  2. todayXbox Series2023
  3. todayPS52023
How this is counted

From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines Iron Danger came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.

Would you like Iron Danger?

Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Iron Danger, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Iron Danger would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.

How this is counted

It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.

Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.

What did people here do with Iron Danger?

  • 1 in 3,630

    Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory

How this is counted

Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.

Games like Iron Danger

  1. 1

    Tactical Breach Wizards

    Iron Danger, but turn-based, and twice the hours

    Loved · 98%Games like Tactical Breach Wizards

  2. 2

    Into the Breach

    Iron Danger, but a roguelike, and pixel art

    Loved · 94%Games like Into the Breach

  3. 3

    Jagged Alliance 2 - Wildfire

    Iron Danger, but turn-based

    Liked · 80%Games like Jagged Alliance 2 - Wildfire

  4. 4

    FINAL FANTASY TACTICS - The Ivalice Chronicles

    Iron Danger, but medieval, and three times the hours

  5. 5

    Gears Tactics

    Iron Danger, but gorier, and turn-based

    Mixed · 75%Games like Gears Tactics

  6. 6

    Banner of the Maid

    Iron Danger, but anime, and twice the hours

    Liked · 86%Games like Banner of the Maid

All 30 games like Iron Danger, and which you already own
How this is counted

Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from Iron Danger: a kind of game it is that Iron Danger is not, a feature its tags carry that Iron Danger's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.

Look up another game