2018 · Action Roguelike · Roguelike · Dungeon Crawler
How long isWizard of Legend?
by Contingent99
13 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 5 hours and 30 hours
Wizard of Legend among the 222 action roguelikes here
The whole tier list#138
of 222
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 44%
- got past 2 hours
- −6 on the kind's 50%
- 10%
- past 20 hours
- −5 on the kind's 15%
- 70%
- launched it
- +3 on the kind's 67%
- 248
- libraries own it
- 1 in 10 of the 2,483 read here
Next to it in the ranking
On the long side for an action roguelike: 13 hours for the typical player, longer than 296 of 347 action roguelikes here.
63% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
85% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
91% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
94% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
97% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
98% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
98% recommend it at 100 to 200 hours
Does Wizard of Legend hold up?
Grows on people
85% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at 2–5 hours played, and 98% at 100–200 hours played.
Earned when the share recommending a game rises 8 points or more from its first stage past the two-hour mark to its last, never falls 5 points on the way, and at least 80% of all its Steam reviewers recommend it. Every game that holds it.
Do the first two hours of Wizard of Legend tell you?
In the first two hours63%recommend it
After that93%recommend it
10 in 100 said no: 7 after the window had closed, 3 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 13 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 5 hours and 30 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 21,200 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 85% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 98% at 100–200 hours.
9% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 63% of those recommend it. After the window, 93% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 67% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 4 hours in.
When would you get there?
13days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 13 hours on Friday, November 27.
Half of its reviewers had played between 5 and 30 hours: Nov 19 to Dec 14 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is Wizard of Legend worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Wizard of Legend
- Steam list price, US
- $15.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 13 h
- action roguelike rate
- $2.10/h
- 13 h at that rate
- $27
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Wizard of Legend worth it? Yes.
Good value
1.7× the hours of a typical action roguelike, for the same money
Loved
93% recommend it after the refund windowmost action roguelikes: 89%
Usually played
70% of owners here have played itmost action roguelikes: 68%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $15.99, the typical player's 13 hours come to $1.23 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 93% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At $1.23 an hour, Wizard of Legend is cheaper per hour than 269 of 347 action roguelikes here: the typical one of 347 action roguelikes here charges $2.10, so the same $15.99 buys 1.7× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (action roguelikes) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Is Wizard of Legend better now than at launch?
May 2018
89%
≈ 1,850 reviews
Now
82%
≈ 550 reviews
How this is counted
Its Steam reviews began in May 2018. Of those posted in the first 30 days, 89% recommend it; of those posted in the last 12 months, 82% do.
One token is 2% of the reviews first posted in its first 30 days, and in the last 12 months. Each counts with the verdict it carries today, so a review its author has since changed shows the new one. The biggest comebacks and falls.
Where can I play Wizard of Legend today?
Almost anywhere
PC, Switch, PS4, Xbox One and 1 more.
- todayPS42018
- todayPC2018
- todayXbox One2018
- todaySwitch2018
- todayiPhone2023
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines Wizard of Legend came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like Wizard of Legend?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Wizard of Legend, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Wizard of Legend would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@nu1x holds this page
- 1st
@nu1x44 h - 2nd
@hiroyuki14 h - 3rd
@player-4312 h - 4th
@mossyotter8.6 h - 5th@slowspeaker8.6 h
- 6th
@poor-leno7.6 h - 7th
@zocchihedron7.2 h - 8th
@zaczaczac7 h
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with Wizard of Legend?
1 in 242
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like Wizard of Legend
Children of Morta
Wizard of Legend, but an action RPG, and co-op
Liked · 88%Games like Children of Morta
The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
Wizard of Legend, but a twin-stick shooter, and five times the hours
Loved · 97%Games like The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth
Enter the Gungeon
Wizard of Legend, but a bullet hell, and twice the hours
Loved · 95%Games like Enter the Gungeon
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from Wizard of Legend: a kind of game it is that Wizard of Legend is not, a feature its tags carry that Wizard of Legend's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.