2023 · RTS · FPS · Shooter
How long isSilica?
by Martin 'Dram' Melichárek
5 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 2 hours and 13 hours
Steep for its length: $4.00 an hour, dearer than 98 of 107 real-time strategy games here.
49% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
83% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
89% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
88% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
88% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
Does Silica hold up?
Holds steady
Do the first two hours of Silica tell you?
In the first two hours49%recommend it
After that86%recommend it
8 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 12 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 5 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 2 hours and 13 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 5,000 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It holds steady: between 83% and 89% recommend it at every stage past the first two hours.
27% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 49% of those recommend it. After the window, 86% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 42% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 1.5 hours in.
When would you get there?
5days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 5 hours on Sunday, October 25.
Half of its reviewers had played between 2 and 13 hours: Oct 22 to Nov 2 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is Silica worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Silica
- Steam list price, US
- $19.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 5 h
- real-time strategy game rate
- $1.84/h
- 5 h at that rate
- $9
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Silica worth it? Mostly.
Pricey per hour
A typical real-time strategy game gives 2.2× the hours for the money
Liked
86% recommend it after the refund windowmost real-time strategy games: 87%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $19.99, the typical player's 5 hours come to $4.00 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 86% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At $4.00 an hour, Silica costs more per hour than 98 of 107 real-time strategy games here: the typical one of 107 real-time strategy games here charges $1.84.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (real-time strategy games) is named by its strongest Steam tags, a narrow kind before a wide one, among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Would you like Silica?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Silica, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Silica would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
What did people here do with Silica?
1 in 1,740
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like Silica
- STAR WARS™ Battlefront™ II13hours
STAR WARS™ Battlefront™ II
- STAR WARS™ Battlefront™5hours
STAR WARS™ Battlefront™
- Enlisted9hours
Enlisted
- Natural Selection 227hours
Natural Selection 2
- Sanctum 27hours
Sanctum 2
- Evolve Stage 211hours
Evolve Stage 2
- Aliens: Colonial Marines8hours
Aliens: Colonial Marines
- Half-Life: Alyx11hours
Half-Life: Alyx
- Serious Sam HD: The First Encounter5.5hours
Serious Sam HD: The First Encounter
- Entropy : Zero 28hours
Entropy : Zero 2
- Aliens vs. Predator8.5hours
Aliens vs. Predator
- Space Hulk: Deathwing - Enhanced Edition6hours
Space Hulk: Deathwing - Enhanced Edition
How this is counted
The same series first, then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the ones of a similar typical length ahead. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.