2011 · RPG · Open World · Medieval
How long isMount & Blade: With Fire and Sword?
by TaleWorlds Entertainment
17 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 5.5 hours and 50 hours
Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword among the 371 action RPGs here
The whole tier list#140
of 371
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 51%
- got past 2 hours
- about the kind's 51%
- 9%
- past 20 hours
- −12 on the kind's 21%
- 65%
- launched it
- about the kind's 65%
- 187
- libraries own it
- 1 in 13 of the 2,483 read here
Next to it in the ranking
A bargain: 59¢ an hour, cheaper than 438 of 465 action RPGs here.
68% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
85% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
89% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
89% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
91% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
91% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
93% recommend it at 100 to 200 hours
94% recommend it at 200 to 500 hours
96% recommend it past 500 hours
Does Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword hold up?
Grows on people
85% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at 2–5 hours played, and 96% past 500 hours played.
Earned when the share recommending a game rises 8 points or more from its first stage past the two-hour mark to its last, never falls 5 points on the way, and at least 80% of all its Steam reviewers recommend it. Every game that holds it.
Do the first two hours of Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword tell you?
In the first two hours68%recommend it
After that90%recommend it
12 in 100 said no: 9 after the window had closed, 3 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 17 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 5.5 hours and 50 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 14,100 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 85% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 96% past 500 hours.
10% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 68% of those recommend it. After the window, 90% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 74% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 7.5 hours in.
When would you get there?
17days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 17 hours on Tuesday, December 1.
Half of its reviewers had played between 5.5 and 50 hours: Nov 20 to Jan 3, 2027 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword
- Steam list price, US
- $9.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 17 h
- action RPG rate
- $1.86/h
- 17 h at that rate
- $32
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword worth it? Yes.
A steal
3.2× the hours of a typical action RPG, for the same money
Loved
90% recommend it after the refund windowmost action RPGs: 86%
Usually played
65% of owners here have played itmost action RPGs: 65%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $9.99, the typical player's 17 hours come to 59¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 90% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 59¢ an hour, Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword is cheaper per hour than 438 of 465 action RPGs here: the typical one of 465 action RPGs here charges $1.86, so the same $9.99 buys 3.2× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (action RPGs) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Where can I play Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword today?
On PC
Its own release still plays there: no collection or remaster needed.
- todayPC2011
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@eso holds this page
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword?
1 in 3,631
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword
Conqueror's Blade
Mount & Blade, but free to play, and a real-time tactics game
Mixed · 67%Games like Conqueror's Blade
Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Mount & Blade, but realistic, and twice the hours
Liked · 84%Games like Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Sons of Valhalla
Mount & Blade, but single-player, and a third of the hours
Mixed · 67%Games like Sons of Valhalla
Blood of Steel
Mount & Blade, but a hack and slash game, and not open world
Mixed · 76%Games like Blood of Steel
Middle-earth: Shadow of War
Mount & Blade, but stealthy, and gorier
Liked · 89%Games like Middle-earth: Shadow of War
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword: a kind of game it is that Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword is not, a feature its tags carry that Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.