2016 · Action RPG · Hack and Slash · Loot
How long isGrim Dawn?
by Crate Entertainment
47 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 15 hours and 145 hours
Grim Dawn among the 369 action RPGs here
The whole tier list#32
of 369
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 69%
- got past 2 hours
- +18 on the kind's 51%
- 31%
- past 20 hours
- +10 on the kind's 21%
- 86%
- launched it
- +21 on the kind's 65%
- 290
- libraries own it
- 1 in 8 of the 2,453 read here
Next to it in the ranking
A bargain: 53¢ an hour, cheaper than 444 of 465 action RPGs here.
60% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
90% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
92% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
94% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
94% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
95% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
96% recommend it at 100 to 200 hours
97% recommend it at 200 to 500 hours
96% recommend it past 500 hours
Does Grim Dawn hold up?
Holds steady
Do the first two hours of Grim Dawn tell you?
In the first two hours60%recommend it
After that95%recommend it
7 in 100 said no: 6 after the window had closed, 1 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 47 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 15 hours and 145 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 110,000 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It holds steady: between 90% and 97% recommend it at every stage past the first two hours.
3% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 60% of those recommend it. After the window, 95% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 79% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 18 hours in.
When would you get there?
7weeks
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 47 hours on Wednesday, December 30.
Half of its reviewers had played between 15 and 145 hours: Nov 28 to Apr 7, 2027 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in Grim Dawn?
The filter
Blood for Blood
13 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold An Old Threat and never earned it.
How this is counted
51% of the players who launched Grim Dawn hold Delivering Justice, its first story achievement on Steam, and 27% hold Defender of Cairn, its last. The steepest drop comes between An Old Threat (45%) and Blood for Blood (32%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Where did you leave it?
Stopped part way? Your Steam profile brings back the story so far, read aloud, up to the last story achievement you hold. Nothing past it.
No Steam, or played it elsewhere?
Is Grim Dawn worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Grim Dawn
- Steam list price, US
- $24.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 47 h
- action RPG rate
- $1.86/h
- 47 h at that rate
- $87
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Grim Dawn worth it? Yes.
A steal
3.5× the hours of a typical action RPG, for the same money
Loved
95% recommend it after the refund windowmost action RPGs: 86%
Gets played
87% of owners here have played itmost action RPGs: 65%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $24.99, the typical player's 47 hours come to 53¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 95% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 53¢ an hour, Grim Dawn is cheaper per hour than 444 of 465 action RPGs here: the typical one of 465 action RPGs here charges $1.86, so the same $24.99 buys 3.5× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (action RPGs) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Where can I play Grim Dawn today?
On Xbox One and PC
Its own release still plays there: no collection or remaster needed.
- todayPC2019in Grim Dawn: Definitive Edition
- todayXbox One2021
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines Grim Dawn came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like Grim Dawn?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Grim Dawn, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Grim Dawn would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@eso holds this page
- 1st
@eso974 h - 2nd
@drezel57 h - 3rd
@attila-the-heather38 h - 4th
@ravage22 h - 5th
@hustensaftschmuggler21 h - 6th
@nestortillo21 h - 7th
@poor-leno15 h - 8th
@zocchihedron13 h
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with Grim Dawn?
1 in 182
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like Grim Dawn
Wolcen: Lords of Mayhem
Grim Dawn, but a third of the hours, and more divisive
Divisive · 56%Games like Wolcen: Lords of Mayhem
Path of Exile
Grim Dawn, but free to play, and three times the hours
Liked · 89%Games like Path of Exile
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from Grim Dawn: a kind of game it is that Grim Dawn is not, a feature its tags carry that Grim Dawn's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.