2018 · Action RPG · RPG · Puzzle
How long isCrossCode?
by Radical Fish Games
41 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 14 hours and 76 hours
CrossCode among the 370 action RPGs here
The whole tier list#131
of 370
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 52%
- got past 2 hours
- about the kind's 51%
- 11%
- past 20 hours
- −10 on the kind's 21%
- 71%
- launched it
- +6 on the kind's 65%
- 111
- libraries own it
- 1 in 22 of the 2,472 read here
Next to it in the ranking
A bargain: 49¢ an hour, cheaper than 452 of 465 action RPGs here.
78% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
85% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
85% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
87% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
92% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
97% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
99% recommend it at 100 to 200 hours
98% recommend it at 200 to 500 hours
Does CrossCode hold up?
Grows on people
85% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at 2–5 hours played, and 98% at 200–500 hours played.
Earned when the share recommending a game rises 8 points or more from its first stage past the two-hour mark to its last, never falls 5 points on the way, and at least 80% of all its Steam reviewers recommend it. Every game that holds it.
Do the first two hours of CrossCode tell you?
In the first two hours78%recommend it
After that93%recommend it
8 in 100 said no: 7 after the window had closed, 1 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 41 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 14 hours and 76 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 18,500 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 85% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 98% at 200–500 hours.
4% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 78% of those recommend it. After the window, 93% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 88% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 14 hours in.
When would you get there?
6weeks
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 41 hours on Thursday, December 24.
Half of its reviewers had played between 14 and 76 hours: Nov 27 to Jan 28, 2027 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in CrossCode?
The filter
Chapter 3 Complete
14 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold Chapter 2 Complete and never earned it.
How this is counted
72% of the players who launched CrossCode hold Real History, its first story achievement on Steam, and 15% hold Chapter 10 Complete, its last. The steepest drop comes between Chapter 2 Complete (67%) and Chapter 3 Complete (53%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Is CrossCode worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
CrossCode
- Steam list price, US
- $19.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 41 h
- action RPG rate
- $1.86/h
- 41 h at that rate
- $76
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is CrossCode worth it? Yes.
A steal
3.8× the hours of a typical action RPG, for the same money
Loved
93% recommend it after the refund windowmost action RPGs: 86%
Usually played
71% of owners here have played itmost action RPGs: 65%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $19.99, the typical player's 41 hours come to 49¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 93% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 49¢ an hour, CrossCode is cheaper per hour than 452 of 465 action RPGs here: the typical one of 465 action RPGs here charges $1.86, so the same $19.99 buys 3.8× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (action RPGs) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Where can I play CrossCode today?
Almost anywhere
PC, PS5, Xbox Series, Switch and 2 more.
- todayPC2018
- todayPS42020
- todaySwitch2020
- todayPS52021
- todayXbox One2021in CrossCode: Deluxe Edition
- todayXbox Series2021in CrossCode: Deluxe Edition
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines CrossCode came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like CrossCode?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like CrossCode, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long CrossCode would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@player-43 holds this page
- 1st
@player-4341 h - 2nd
@mrtester19 h - 3rd
@ravage7.5 h - 4th
@tutel3.7 h - 5th
@nu1x3.4 h - 6th
@poor-leno3 min - 7th
@tyr1 min
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with CrossCode?
1 in 173
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like CrossCode
Ys VI: The Ark of Napishtim
CrossCode, but a third of the hours
Loved · 90%Games like Ys VI: The Ark of Napishtim
FINAL FANTASY XV WINDOWS EDITION
Much the same as CrossCode
Liked · 83%Games like FINAL FANTASY XV WINDOWS EDITION
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from CrossCode: a kind of game it is that CrossCode is not, a feature its tags carry that CrossCode's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.