2013 · Platformer · Rhythm · Minimalist
How long is140?
by Carlsen Games
2 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 1 hour and 3.5 hours
140 among the 77 precision platformers here
The whole tier list#17
of 77
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 56%
- got past 2 hours
- +14 on the kind's 42%
- 1%
- past 20 hours
- −5 on the kind's 6%
- 78%
- launched it
- +14 on the kind's 64%
- 120
- libraries own it
- 1 in 21 of the 2,483 read here
Next to it in the ranking
On the short side for a precision platformer: 2 hours for the typical player, shorter than 85 of 104 precision platformers here.
90% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
95% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
97% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
98% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
Does 140 hold up?
Holds steady
At least 94% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at every stage from 2 to 20 hours played.
Earned when at least 90% of a game's Steam reviewers recommend it at every stage past the first two hours, counted over three or more stages of 200 reviews each, with no stage 5 points below an earlier one. Every game that holds it.
Do the first two hours of 140 tell you?
In the first two hours90%recommend it
After that96%recommend it
7 in 100 said no: 2 after the window had closed, 5 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 2 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 1 hour and 3.5 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 4,740 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It holds steady: between 95% and 98% recommend it at every stage past the first two hours.
55% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 90% of those recommend it. After the window, 96% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 27% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 1 hour in.
When would you get there?
2days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 2 hours on Monday, November 16.
Half of its reviewers had played between 1 and 3.5 hours: tonight to Nov 18 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in 140?
The filter
10001100-10
12 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold 10001100-01 and never earned it.
How this is counted
57% of the players who launched 140 hold 10001100-01, its first story achievement on Steam, and 35% hold 10001100-11, its last. The steepest drop comes between 10001100-01 (57%) and 10001100-10 (45%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Is 140 worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
140
- Steam list price, US
- $4.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 2 h
- precision platformer rate
- $2.50/h
- 2 h at that rate
- $5
About the going rate
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is 140 worth it? Yes.
Fair price
About what a typical precision platformer charges: $2.50 an hour
Loved
96% recommend it after the refund windowmost precision platformers: 91%
Gets played
78% of owners here have played itmost precision platformers: 70%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $4.99, the typical player's 2 hours come to $2.50 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 96% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. An hour of 140 costs about what the typical one of 104 precision platformers here charges $2.50.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (precision platformers) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Where can I play 140 today?
Almost anywhere
PC, Switch, PS4 and Xbox One.
- todayPC2013
- Wii U2016
- todayPS42016
- todayXbox One2016
- todaySwitch2020
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines 140 came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like 140?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like 140, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long 140 would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@eltorga holds this page
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with 140?
1 in 3,631
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like 140
Beatbuddy: Tale of the Guardians
140, but more divisive
Mixed · 75%Games like Beatbuddy: Tale of the Guardians
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from 140: a kind of game it is that 140 is not, a feature its tags carry that 140's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.