2017 · RPG · JRPG · Creature Collector
How long isWORLD OF FINAL FANTASY?
by Square Enix
17 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 5.5 hours and 44 hours
WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY among the 202 JRPGs here
The whole tier list#111
of 202
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 44%
- got past 2 hours
- about the kind's 45%
- 14%
- past 20 hours
- about the kind's 12%
- 56%
- launched it
- −4 on the kind's 59%
- 36
- libraries own it
- 1 in 68 of the 2,453 read here
Next to it in the ranking
A wall partway in: one story step stops 30 in 100 of the players who launched it.
35% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
76% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
78% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
82% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
85% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
89% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
Does WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY hold up?
Grows on people
Do the first two hours of WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY tell you?
In the first two hours35%recommend it
After that83%recommend it
24 in 100 said no: 14 after the window had closed, 10 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 17 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 5.5 hours and 44 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 3,400 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 76% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 89% at 50–100 hours.
15% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 35% of those recommend it. After the window, 83% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 60% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 5.5 hours in.
When would you get there?
17days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 17 hours on Monday, November 30.
Half of its reviewers had played between 5.5 and 44 hours: Nov 19 to Dec 27 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY?
The filter
The Saviors of Cornelia
30 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold Gateway to Adventure and never earned it.
How this is counted
82% of the players who launched WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY hold Gateway to Adventure, its first story achievement on Steam, and 10% hold Turn Those Corners Up, its last. The steepest drop comes between Gateway to Adventure (82%) and The Saviors of Cornelia (52%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Is WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY
- Steam list price, US
- $24.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 17 h
- JRPG rate
- $1.45/h
- 17 h at that rate
- $25
About the going rate
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY worth it? Mostly.
Fair price
About what a typical JRPG charges: $1.47 an hour
Liked
83% recommend it after the refund windowmost JRPGs: 89%
Usually played
56% of owners here have played itmost JRPGs: 59%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $24.99, the typical player's 17 hours come to $1.47 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 83% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. An hour of WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY costs about what the typical one of 276 JRPGs here charges $1.45.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (JRPGs) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Where can I play WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY today?
Almost anywhere
PC, Switch, PS4 and Xbox One.
- PS Vita2016
- todayPS42018as World of Final Fantasy: Maxima
- todayPC2018as World of Final Fantasy: Maxima
- todayXbox One2018as World of Final Fantasy: Maxima
- todaySwitch2018as World of Final Fantasy: Maxima
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
@keita holds this page
- 1st
@keita29 h - 2nd
@eltorga2.8 h - 3rdopen– – –
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
Games like WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY
Ni no Kuni Wrath of the White Witch Remastered
Much the same as WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY
Digimon Story Cyber Sleuth: Complete Edition
WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY, but not open world, and PvP
Monster Sanctuary
WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY, but a metroidvania, and pixel art
Loved · 91%Games like Monster Sanctuary
Nexomon: Extinction
WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY, but top-down, and funny
Loved · 90%Games like Nexomon: Extinction
DRAGON QUEST XI: Echoes of an Elusive Age
WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY, but three times the hours
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY: a kind of game it is that WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY is not, a feature its tags carry that WORLD OF FINAL FANTASY's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.