2017 · Space · Mars · Exploration
How long isTake On Mars?
by Bohemia Interactive
14 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 3.5 hours and 45 hours
Poorly received: only 59% recommend it past the refund window; most simulation games here, 91%.
31% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
49% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
57% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
59% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
63% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
60% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
Does Take On Mars hold up?
Grows on people
Do the first two hours of Take On Mars tell you?
In the first two hours31%recommend it
After that59%recommend it
15 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 5 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 14 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 3.5 hours and 45 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 2,050 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 49% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 60% at 50–100 hours.
17% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 31% of those recommend it. After the window, 59% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 74% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 9 hours in.
When would you get there?
14days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 14 hours on Tuesday, November 3.
Half of its reviewers had played between 3.5 and 45 hours: Oct 24 to Dec 4 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is Take On Mars worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Take On Mars
- Steam list price, US
- $9.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 14 h
- simulation game rate
- $2.00/h
- 14 h at that rate
- $28
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Take On Mars worth it? Mostly.
A steal
2.8× the hours of a typical simulation game, for the same money
Divisive
59% recommend it after the refund windowmost simulation games: 91%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $9.99, the typical player's 14 hours come to 71¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 59% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 71¢ an hour, Take On Mars is cheaper per hour than 652 of 722 simulation games here: the typical one of 722 simulation games here charges $2.00, so the same $9.99 buys 2.8× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (simulation games) is named by its strongest Steam tags, a narrow kind before a wide one, among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Would you like Take On Mars?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Take On Mars, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Take On Mars would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
What did people here do with Take On Mars?
1 of 3
Copies in the libraries here: never launched it
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.