2024 · Space · Sci-fi · FPS
How long isSTAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection?
by Aspyr
1 hour
for the typical playerhalf of them between 30 minutes and 3 hours
Poorly received: only 50% recommend it past the refund window, reviewed worse than 365 of 368 first-person shooters here.
13% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
43% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
52% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
60% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
61% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
Does STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection hold up?
Grows on people
Do the first two hours of STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection tell you?
In the first two hours13%recommend it
After that50%recommend it
4 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 16 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 1 hour or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 30 minutes and 3 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 7,880 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It grows on people: 43% recommend it at 2–5 hours, and 61% at 20–50 hours.
69% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 13% of those recommend it. After the window, 50% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 21% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 50 minutes in.
When would you get there?
Tonight
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 1 hour tonight.
Half of its reviewers had played between 30 minutes and 3 hours: tonight to Oct 23 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection
- Steam list price, US
- $35.01
- Typical player
- ÷ 1 h
- first-person shooter rate
- $2.50/h
- 1 h at that rate
- $2
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection worth it? Probably not.
Pricey per hour
A typical first-person shooter gives 14× the hours for the money
Divisive
50% recommend it after the refund windowmost first-person shooters: 89%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $35.01, the typical player's 1 hour come to $35.01 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 50% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At $35.01 an hour, STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection costs more per hour than 367 of 368 first-person shooters here: the typical one of 368 first-person shooters here charges $2.50.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (first-person shooters) is named by its strongest Steam tags, a narrow kind before a wide one, among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Would you like STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
Games like STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection
- Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (Classic, 2005)9hours
Star Wars: Battlefront 2 (Classic, 2005)
- STAR WARS™ Battlefront™ II13hours
STAR WARS™ Battlefront™ II
- STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004)4hours
STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004)
- PRAGMATA13hours
PRAGMATA
- Serious Sam 3: BFE8.5hours
Serious Sam 3: BFE
- Dead Space 210hours
Dead Space 2
- Dead Space (2008)11hours
Dead Space (2008)
- EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair19hours
EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 4.1 The Shadow of New Despair
- Halo: The Master Chief Collection16hours
Halo: The Master Chief Collection
- Angels Fall First5hours
Angels Fall First
- Aliens: Colonial Marines8hours
Aliens: Colonial Marines
- Call of Duty: Black Ops III22hours
Call of Duty: Black Ops III
How this is counted
The same series first, then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the ones of a similar typical length ahead. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.