2026 · Extraction Shooter · Vehicular Combat · Battle Royale
How long isSand?
by Hologryph & TowerHaus
17 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 5.5 hours and 45 hours
On the long side for a first-person shooter: 17 hours for the typical player, longer than 325 of 368 first-person shooters here.
35% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
58% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
55% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
52% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
49% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
45% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
45% recommend it at 100 to 200 hours
44% recommend it at 200 to 500 hours
Does Sand hold up?
Wears thin
Do the first two hours of Sand tell you?
In the first two hours35%recommend it
After that51%recommend it
18 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 2 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 17 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 5.5 hours and 45 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 14,200 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It is recommended most by players at 2–5 hours: 58% of them. Among players at 200–500 hours that falls to 44%.
10% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 35% of those recommend it. After the window, 51% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 88% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 18 hours in.
When would you get there?
17days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 17 hours on Friday, November 6.
Half of its reviewers had played between 5.5 and 45 hours: Oct 26 to Dec 4 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is Sand worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Sand
- Steam list price, US
- $24.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 17 h
- first-person shooter rate
- $2.50/h
- 17 h at that rate
- $42
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Sand worth it? Probably not.
Good value
1.7× the hours of a typical first-person shooter, for the same money
Divisive
51% recommend it after the refund windowmost first-person shooters: 89%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $24.99, the typical player's 17 hours come to $1.47 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 51% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At $1.47 an hour, Sand is cheaper per hour than 282 of 368 first-person shooters here: the typical one of 368 first-person shooters here charges $2.50, so the same $24.99 buys 1.7× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (first-person shooters) is named by its strongest Steam tags, a narrow kind before a wide one, among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Would you like Sand?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Sand, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Sand would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
Games like Sand
- The Cycle: Frontier12hours
The Cycle: Frontier
- Dark and Darker16hours
Dark and Darker
- Ring of Elysium13hours
Ring of Elysium
- Gray Zone Warfare17hours
Gray Zone Warfare
- STALZONE45hours
STALZONE
- Lost Light11hours
Lost Light
- Realm Royale Reforged12hours
Realm Royale Reforged
- Z1 Battle Royale32hours
Z1 Battle Royale
- Farlight 8417hours
Farlight 84
- Darwin Project6hours
Darwin Project
- Sea of Thieves27hours
Sea of Thieves
- CreativeDestruction8.5hours
CreativeDestruction
How this is counted
The same series first, then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the ones of a similar typical length ahead. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.