2023 · Sandbox · War · World War I
How long isRising Front?
5 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 2 hours and 14 hours
Exceptionally loved: 96% recommend it past the refund window, better reviewed than 531 of 635 first-person shooters here.
61% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
94% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
96% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
98% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
98% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
Does Rising Front hold up?
Holds steady

At least 94% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at every stage from 2 to 50 hours played.
Earned when at least 90% of a game's Steam reviewers recommend it at every stage past the first two hours, counted over three or more stages of 200 reviews each, with no stage 5 points below an earlier one. Every game that holds it.
Do the first two hours of Rising Front tell you?
In the first two hours61%recommend it
After that96%recommend it
5 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 15 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 5 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 2 hours and 14 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 4,330 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It holds steady: between 94% and 98% recommend it at every stage past the first two hours.
24% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 61% of those recommend it. After the window, 96% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 23% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 50 minutes in.
When would you get there?
5days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 5 hours on Monday, October 26.
Half of its reviewers had played between 2 and 14 hours: Oct 23 to Nov 4 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is Rising Front worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Rising Front
- Steam list price, US
- $14.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 5 h
- first-person shooter rate
- $2.67/h
- 5 h at that rate
- $13
About the going rate
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Rising Front worth it? Yes.
Fair price
About what a typical first-person shooter charges: $3.00 an hour
Loved
96% recommend it after the refund windowmost first-person shooters: 89%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $14.99, the typical player's 5 hours come to $3.00 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 96% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. An hour of Rising Front costs about what the typical one of 635 first-person shooters here charges $2.67.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (first-person shooters) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Would you like Rising Front?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Rising Front, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Rising Front would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
Games like Rising Front
- Verdun12hours
Verdun
- Tannenberg6.5hours
Tannenberg
- Holdfast: Nations At War13hours
Holdfast: Nations At War
- Over The Top: WWI5.5hours
Over The Top: WWI
- Battlefield™ 115hours
Battlefield™ 1
- Totally Accurate Battle Simulator16hours
Totally Accurate Battle Simulator
- Beyond The Wire4hours
Beyond The Wire
- IRON NEST: Heavy Turret Simulator5hours
IRON NEST: Heavy Turret Simulator
- 11-11 Memories Retold6hours
11-11 Memories Retold
- Battle of Empires : 1914-191811hours
Battle of Empires : 1914-1918
- Last Train Home24hours
Last Train Home
- Valiant Hearts: The Great War™ / Soldats Inconnus : Mémoires de la Grande Guerre™7hours
Valiant Hearts: The Great War™ / Soldats Inconnus : Mémoires de la Grande Guerre™
How this is counted
The same series first, then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.