Platformer · Comedy · Time Travel
How long isNo Time to Explain?
by tinyBuild
1.5 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 45 minutes and 3.5 hours
Over in an evening: half its reviewers had played 1.5 hours or less.
59% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
86% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
Do the first two hours of No Time to Explain tell you?
In the first two hours59%recommend it
After that86%recommend it
4 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 16 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 1.5 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 45 minutes and 3.5 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 808 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
56% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 59% of those recommend it. After the window, 86% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 21% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 55 minutes in.
When would you get there?
2days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 1.5 hours on Friday, October 23.
Half of its reviewers had played between 45 minutes and 3.5 hours: tonight to Oct 25 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Would you like No Time to Explain?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like No Time to Explain, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long No Time to Explain would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
What did people here do with No Time to Explain?
1 in 437
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like No Time to Explain
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from No Time to Explain: a kind of game it is that No Time to Explain is not, a feature its tags carry that No Time to Explain's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.