2026 · Incremental · Idler · Horror
How long isHorripilant?
by Alexandre Declos & Pas Game Studio
23 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 12 hours and 40 hours
An absurd bargain: 35¢ an hour, cheaper than 649 of 669 casual games here.
91% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
85% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
93% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
95% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
94% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
Does Horripilant hold up?
Wears thin
Do the first two hours of Horripilant tell you?
In the first two hours82%recommend it
After that93%recommend it
18 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 2 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 23 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 12 hours and 40 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 3,190 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It is recommended most by players at 2–5 hours: 91% of them. Among players at 5–10 hours that falls to 85%.
5% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 82% of those recommend it. After the window, 93% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 89% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 16 hours in.
When would you get there?
3weeks
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 23 hours on Thursday, November 12.
Half of its reviewers had played between 12 and 40 hours: Nov 1 to Nov 29 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in Horripilant?
The filter
I hear crumbling...
30 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold Meet god. and never earned it.
How this is counted
97% of the players who launched Horripilant hold Meet god., its first story achievement on Steam, and 44% hold The Final Passage, its last. The steepest drop comes between Meet god. (97%) and I hear crumbling... (67%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Is Horripilant worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Horripilant
- Steam list price, US
- $7.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 23 h
- casual game rate
- $2.31/h
- 23 h at that rate
- $53
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Horripilant worth it? Mostly.
A steal
6.6× the hours of a typical casual game, for the same money
Loved
93% recommend it after the refund windowmost casual games: 92%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $7.99, the typical player's 23 hours come to 35¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 93% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 35¢ an hour, Horripilant is cheaper per hour than 649 of 669 casual games here: the typical one of 669 casual games here charges $2.31, so the same $7.99 buys 6.6× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (casual games) is named by its strongest Steam tags, a narrow kind before a wide one, among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Would you like Horripilant?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Horripilant, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Horripilant would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
What did people here do with Horripilant?
1 of 3
Copies in the libraries here: never launched it
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.