2021 · RPG · JRPG · Class-Based
How long isFINAL FANTASY III?
by Square Enix
16 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 10 hours and 24 hours
FINAL FANTASY III among the 203 JRPGs here
The whole tier list#153
of 203
ranked by owners here who played past two hours
- 28%
- got past 2 hours
- −16 on the kind's 45%
- 7%
- past 20 hours
- −6 on the kind's 12%
- 35%
- launched it
- −24 on the kind's 59%
- 46
- libraries own it
- 1 in 54 of the 2,483 read here
Next to it in the ranking
Mostly left in the box: 64% of the owners here never launched it, more than for 148 of 174 JRPGs.
92% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
90% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
93% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
96% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
Does FINAL FANTASY III hold up?
Holds steady
Do the first two hours of FINAL FANTASY III tell you?
In the first two hours76%recommend it
After that94%recommend it
7 in 100 said no: 6 after the window had closed, 1 while a refund was still possible.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 16 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 10 hours and 24 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 2,910 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It holds steady: between 90% and 96% recommend it at every stage past the first two hours.
4% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 76% of those recommend it. After the window, 94% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 87% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 12 hours in.
When would you get there?
16days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 16 hours on Monday, November 30.
Half of its reviewers had played between 10 and 24 hours: Nov 24 to Dec 8 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Where do players get filtered in FINAL FANTASY III?
The filter
Crushing Force
10 of every 100 players got to this one and no further.
They hold Hope of the Wind and never earned it.
How this is counted
90% of the players who launched FINAL FANTASY III hold Hope of the Wind, its first story achievement on Steam, and 53% hold A Vision of Hope, its last. The steepest drop comes between Hope of the Wind (90%) and Crushing Force (80%).
Steam's global achievement stats count everyone who ever launched the game, people still playing included. They are not a finish rate. The filter is the steepest drop between two story achievements; the players who never reached the first one barely started, and are never the filter.
Is FINAL FANTASY III worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
FINAL FANTASY III
- Steam list price, US
- $17.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 16 h
- JRPG rate
- $1.47/h
- 16 h at that rate
- $24
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is FINAL FANTASY III worth it? Mostly.
Good value
1.3× the hours of a typical JRPG, for the same money
Loved
94% recommend it after the refund windowmost JRPGs: 89%
Often left unplayed
36% of owners here have played itmost JRPGs: 58%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $17.99, the typical player's 16 hours come to $1.12 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 94% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At $1.12 an hour, FINAL FANTASY III is cheaper per hour than 180 of 276 JRPGs here: the typical one of 276 JRPGs here charges $1.47, so the same $17.99 buys 1.3× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (JRPGs) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Where can I play FINAL FANTASY III today?
Almost anywhere
PC, Xbox Series, Switch, PS4 and 2 more.
- todayAndroid2021
- todayPC2021
- todayiPhone2021
- todayPS42023
- todaySwitch2023
- todayXbox Series2024
How this is counted
From IGDB, found by its Steam app: the machines FINAL FANTASY III came out on and the year it first reached each, and the collections, ports, remasters and remakes that carry it. A machine counts for today while it, or the one after it, still plays its games and its store sells them: Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One and Series, PC and phones. A PC release from before 2005 counts as gone, unless Steam sells it. IGDB does not say when a store stopped selling a release, so a delisted one can still show here.
Would you like FINAL FANTASY III?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like FINAL FANTASY III, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long FINAL FANTASY III would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
Nobody holds this page yet
- 1st
@tyr1 min - 2ndopen– – –
- 3rdopen– – –
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on this game. From two hours up, the most hours holds the page.
What did people here do with FINAL FANTASY III?
1 in 6
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.
Games like FINAL FANTASY III
Sea of Stars: Sunset Edition
FINAL FANTASY III, but couch co-op
Liked · 88%Games like Sea of Stars: Sunset Edition
Romancing SaGa 2: Revenge of the Seven
FINAL FANTASY III, but 3D, and three times the hours
DRAGON QUEST III HD-2D Remake
FINAL FANTASY III, but 2.5D, and twice the hours
Mixed · 78%Games like DRAGON QUEST III HD-2D Remake
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
FINAL FANTASY III, but twice the hours
Loved · 95%Games like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
Chained Echoes
FINAL FANTASY III, but with mechs, and twice the hours
Liked · 89%Games like Chained Echoes
How this is counted
Its own series apart, where it plays alike; then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the better known ahead among the about as alike. A model that knows games read the list once: the ones it said do not play like this game are left out, the closest come first. Under each name, what sets it apart from FINAL FANTASY III: a kind of game it is that FINAL FANTASY III is not, a feature its tags carry that FINAL FANTASY III's barely do, how many hours people play it, how its reviewers feel. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.