Video Game BacklogAnalyze your library
Amazing Frog? cover

2014 · Sandbox · Physics · Open World

How long isAmazing Frog??

by Fayju

15 hours

for the typical playerhalf of them between 5.5 hours and 43 hours

Exceptionally loved: 96% recommend it past the refund window, better reviewed than 186 of 239 sandbox games here.

Does Amazing Frog? hold up?

Holds steady

Holds up seal

At least 95% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at every stage from 2 to 500+ hours played.

Earned when at least 90% of a game's Steam reviewers recommend it at every stage past the first two hours, counted over three or more stages of 200 reviews each, with no stage 5 points below an earlier one. Every game that holds it.

Made this game? Put the seal on your site
Download PNG
<a href="https://www.videogamebacklog.com/game/amazing-frog#seals"><img src="https://www.videogamebacklog.com/game/amazing-frog/seal/holds-up.png" width="160" height="160" alt="Amazing Frog?: Holds up. At least 95% of its Steam reviewers recommend it at every stage from 2 to 500+ hours played."></a>

Do the first two hours of Amazing Frog? tell you?

In the first two hours72%recommend it

After that96%recommend it

12 of every 20 thumbs-down came after the window had closed, 8 while a refund was still possible.

How this is counted

Half of its Steam reviewers had played 15 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 5.5 hours and 43 hours.

One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 11,800 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.

It holds steady: between 95% and 99% recommend it at every stage past the first two hours.

8% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 72% of those recommend it. After the window, 96% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 61% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 4.5 hours in.

When would you get there?

15days

At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 15 hours on Wednesday, November 4.

Half of its reviewers had played between 5.5 and 43 hours: Oct 26 to Dec 2 at this pace.

How this is counted

The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.

Is Amazing Frog? worth it?

Is Amazing Frog? worth it? Yes.

  • Good value

    1.3× the hours of a typical sandbox game, for the same money

  • Loved

    96% recommend it after the refund windowmost sandbox games: 91%

How this is counted

At Steam's US list price of $19.99, the typical player's 15 hours come to $1.33 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 96% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At $1.33 an hour, Amazing Frog? is cheaper per hour than 148 of 239 sandbox games here: the typical one of 239 sandbox games here charges $1.80, so the same $19.99 buys 1.3× the hours.

The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (sandbox games) is named by its strongest Steam tags, a narrow kind before a wide one, among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.

Would you like Amazing Frog??

Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Amazing Frog?, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Amazing Frog? would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.

How this is counted

It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.

Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.

What did people here do with Amazing Frog??

  • 1 in 3,480

    Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory

How this is counted

Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.

Games like Amazing Frog?

All 30 games like Amazing Frog?, and which you already own
How this is counted

The same series first, then the games sharing the most of its strongest Steam tags, genres and themes, the ones of a similar typical length ahead. Each case wears the hours its own page leads with.