2018 · Utilities · Software · Design & Illustration
How long isWallpaper Engine?
by Wallpaper Engine Team
14 hours
for the typical playerhalf of them between 5.5 hours and 44 hours
An absurd bargain: 36¢ an hour, cheaper than 1,950 of 2,003 casual games here.
95% recommend it at 0 to 2 hours
98% recommend it at 2 to 5 hours
98% recommend it at 5 to 10 hours
98% recommend it at 10 to 20 hours
98% recommend it at 20 to 50 hours
98% recommend it at 50 to 100 hours
97% recommend it at 100 to 200 hours
95% recommend it at 200 to 500 hours
92% recommend it past 500 hours
Does Wallpaper Engine hold up?
Wears thin
Do the first two hours of Wallpaper Engine tell you?
In the first two hours95%recommend it
After that98%recommend it
2 in 100 said no: 2 after the window had closed.
How this is counted
Half of its Steam reviewers had played 14 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 5.5 hours and 44 hours.
One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 1,030,000 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.
It is recommended most by players at 5–10 hours: 98% of them. Among players past 500 hours that falls to 92%.
7% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 95% of those recommend it. After the window, 98% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 87% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 21 hours in.
When would you get there?
14days
At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 14 hours on Saturday, November 28.
Half of its reviewers had played between 5.5 and 44 hours: Nov 20 to Dec 28 at this pace.
How this is counted
The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.
Is Wallpaper Engine worth it?
Video Game Backlog
One hour, at list price
Wallpaper Engine
- Steam list price, US
- $4.99
- Typical player
- ÷ 14 h
- casual game rate
- $2.22/h
- 14 h at that rate
- $31
List price. Not a sale price,
not what anyone paid.
Is Wallpaper Engine worth it? Mostly.
A steal
6.2× the hours of a typical casual game, for the same money
Loved
98% recommend it after the refund windowmost casual games: 91%
How this is counted
At Steam's US list price of $4.99, the typical player's 14 hours come to 36¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 98% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 36¢ an hour, Wallpaper Engine is cheaper per hour than 1950 of 2003 casual games here: the typical one of 2003 casual games here charges $2.22, so the same $4.99 buys 6.2× the hours.
The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (casual games) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.
Would you like Wallpaper Engine?
Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Wallpaper Engine, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Wallpaper Engine would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.
How this is counted
It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.
Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.
Nobody can hold this page
- 1st
@hiroyuki1,626 h - 2nd
@kabachok-142958 h - 3rd
@eltorga205 h - 4th
@naik16173 h - 5th
@zocchihedron153 h - 6th
@ur-disproven98 h - 7th
@gwynn796 h - 8th
@dramocelus96 h
Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on it. Steam sells this one as software that runs in the background, so its hours hold nothing.
What did people here do with Wallpaper Engine?
16 of 187
Copies in the libraries here: never launched it
- B
The middle pick of 22 players on the Steam tier list
1 in 93
Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory
In @dramocelus's Top 4
How this is counted
Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more. The tier is the middle player's on the Steam tier list, shown once ten players have ranked it.