Video Game BacklogAnalyze your library
PixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate cover

2015 · Twin Stick Shooter · Physics · Local Co-Op

How long isPixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate?

by Q-Games Ltd. & Double Eleven

6 hours

for the typical playerhalf of them between 2 hours and 15 hours

A touch long for a twin-stick shooter: 6 hours for the typical player, longer than 51 of 78 twin-stick shooters here.

Do the first two hours of PixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate tell you?

In the first two hours69%recommend it

After that94%recommend it

How this is counted

Half of its Steam reviewers had played 6 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 2 hours and 15 hours.

One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 261 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.

26% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 69% of those recommend it. After the window, 94% do.

When would you get there?

6days

At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 6 hours on Tuesday, October 27.

Half of its reviewers had played between 2 and 15 hours: Oct 23 to Nov 5 at this pace.

How this is counted

The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.

Is PixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate worth it?

Is PixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate worth it? Yes.

  • Good value

    1.4× the hours of a typical twin-stick shooter, for the same money

  • Loved

    94% recommend it after the refund windowmost twin-stick shooters: 92%

How this is counted

At Steam's US list price of $9.99, the typical player's 6 hours come to $1.67 an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 94% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At $1.67 an hour, PixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate is cheaper per hour than 53 of 78 twin-stick shooters here: the typical one of 78 twin-stick shooters here charges $2.38, so the same $9.99 buys 1.4× the hours.

The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (twin-stick shooters) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.

Would you like PixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate?

Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like PixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long PixelJunk™ Shooter Ultimate would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.

How this is counted

It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.

Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.