Video Game Backlog
Analyze

2018 · Utilities · Software · FPS

How long isLossless Scaling?

by THS

Open in Steam

8 hours

for the typical playerhalf of them between 2 hours and 34 hours

Lossless Scaling cover

A bargain: 87¢ an hour, cheaper than 8,605 of 9,785 games here.

Does Lossless Scaling hold up?

Holds steady

Do the first two hours of Lossless Scaling tell you?

In the first two hours76%recommend it

After that96%recommend it

9 in 100 said no: 3 after the window had closed, 6 while a refund was still possible.

How this is counted

Half of its Steam reviewers had played 8 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 2 hours and 34 hours.

One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 39,900 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.

It holds steady: between 93% and 98% recommend it at every stage past the first two hours.

26% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 76% of those recommend it. After the window, 96% do. Of the players who gave it a thumbs-down, 33% were already past the window; the typical thumbs-down came 55 minutes in.

Diese Seite auf Deutsch

When would you get there?

8days

At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 8 hours on Sunday, November 22.

Half of its reviewers had played between 2 and 34 hours: Nov 16 to Dec 18 at this pace.

How this is counted

The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.

Is Lossless Scaling worth it?

Is Lossless Scaling worth it? Yes.

  • A steal

    2.5× the hours of a typical Steam game, for the same money

  • Loved

    96% recommend it after the refund windowmost Steam games: 89%

How this is counted

At Steam's US list price of $6.99, the typical player's 8 hours come to 87¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 96% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 87¢ an hour, Lossless Scaling is cheaper per hour than 8605 of 9785 Steam games here: the typical one of 9785 Steam games here charges $2.22, so the same $6.99 buys 2.5× the hours.

The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (Steam games) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.

Would you like Lossless Scaling?

Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Lossless Scaling, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Lossless Scaling would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.

How this is counted

It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.

Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.

Nobody can hold this page

  1. 1st@ravage27 h
  2. 2nd@meme-believer24 h
  3. 3rd@teddy-bear-inc20 h
  4. 4th@nervoser-owo16 h
  5. 5th@tyrese-maxey9.9 h
  6. 6th@test1cul-r-tors1on8.4 h
  7. 7th@masterkillerx6.9 h
  8. 8th@raysky6 h

Public pages here, by the hours Steam has on it. Steam sells this one as software that runs in the background, so its hours hold nothing.

What did people here do with Lossless Scaling?

  • 7 of 40

    Copies in the libraries here: never launched it

  • 1 in 1,816

    Name 100 runs say its name: players asked to name 100 games from memory

How this is counted

Counted from the Steam libraries read here and the pages kept here, not from all of Steam's players. A case is one owner, or one in twenty of them when there are more.

Look up another game