Video Game BacklogAnalyze your library

1989 · 1990's · Point & Click · Fantasy

How long isQuest for Glory Collection?

by Sierra

12 hours

for the typical playerhalf of them between 3 hours and 37 hours

Quest for Glory Collection cover

Long for a point-and-click adventure: 12 hours for the typical player, longer than 366 of 406 point-and-click adventures here.

Do the first two hours of Quest for Glory Collection tell you?

In the first two hours93%recommend it

After that96%recommend it

How this is counted

Half of its Steam reviewers had played 12 hours or less when they gave their verdict. The middle half sat between 3 hours and 37 hours.

One token is 1% of its Steam reviews, standing at the hours its author had played. Counted from about 507 Steam reviews, by the hours each author had played when they wrote theirs. It is not a time to beat.

22% of its reviews were written inside Steam's two-hour refund window, and 93% of those recommend it. After the window, 96% do.

When would you get there?

12days

At an hour a night, you’d pass the typical player’s 12 hours on Monday, November 2.

Half of its reviewers had played between 3 and 37 hours: Oct 24 to Nov 27 at this pace.

How this is counted

The typical player's hours are the hours Steam reviewers had played when they wrote their review, not a time to beat. The days count from today, playing the hours the pace says on each day.

Is Quest for Glory Collection worth it?

Is Quest for Glory Collection worth it? Yes.

  • A steal

    2.4× the hours of a typical point-and-click adventure, for the same money

  • Loved

    96% recommend it after the refund windowmost point-and-click adventures: 91%

How this is counted

At Steam's US list price of $9.99, the typical player's 12 hours come to 83¢ an hour. Past the two-hour refund window, 96% of its Steam reviewers recommend it. At 83¢ an hour, Quest for Glory Collection is cheaper per hour than 373 of 406 point-and-click adventures here: the typical one of 406 point-and-click adventures here charges $2.00, so the same $9.99 buys 2.4× the hours.

The price is Steam's US list price for the game by itself: not a sale price, a bundle or what anyone paid. The hours are the ones its reviewers had played, not a time to beat. Its kind (point-and-click adventures) is what the game is first, as a model that knows games named it once from a list of Steam's kinds (for a game it did not know, its strongest Steam tags name it), among the kinds with at least 20 priced games here; failing that, by its Steam genre. The going rate is the middle hourly cost of those games, and the receipt prices its typical hours at it. The words beside it compare it with its kind: loved is 90% recommending it or more, liked 80%, mixed 65%; it gets played when a quarter fewer of the owners read here never launched it than of its kind's typical game. Whether it holds up is drawn on the hours road above, and counts toward the one-word answer.

Would you like Quest for Glory Collection?

Give the ball your Steam profile link or name. It reads the games you own most like Quest for Glory Collection, how long each held you against the typical player, and how long Quest for Glory Collection would take you. Public profiles only. No account needed, and no library is saved.

How this is counted

It reads how long you tend to stay: across every game you've played whose typical hours it knows (free games left out), how often you went past the typical player and how often you left before half their hours. It glows when you often stay past them, dims when you often leave early, and needs five played games to read at all. Then it shows the games you own most like this one, by the same measure as the shelf of games like it, each with your hours against the typical player's.

Why not a forecast for this game: on 36,766 Steam libraries, how a player did on games like one told little beyond how long they stay in games at all, so those games are shown as evidence and never scored. Nothing of the library is kept.